Not A Good Fit

Fourteen days, 120 applicants, and a Post Suitability Assessment Manual that keeps growing new clauses. You sit on this side of the desk. The person opposite pushes their papers across. You read them, you check them against the manual, you stamp. **Reject someone and you must pick a specific reason from a dropdown.** That reason is then read out, to their face. Somebody turned away for "age" does not say the same thing as somebody turned away for "field of study". That is the core mechanic, and the only weapon this game has. The manual only ever grows. Day three adds age. Day five adds which university you first attended. Day six adds clause seven: married with children preferred; a female applicant who is married without children, or who may have children within three years, is deemed unsuitable. A man who registered his marriage the same month passes that same day. Then on day eight the equal-employment inspection arrives. The clause is not repealed — it is rewritten. The new wording does not contain the word "women" anywhere: this post does not accept continuous gaps in employment. Same clause number, same test, not one person filtered differently. The argument of the whole game is on that page. You are on the ledger too. The mortgage cannot be cancelled; your mother's medicine and your daughter's tutoring can. Letting someone through costs you a review slip, and the first two each day are only a warning — so mercy is always affordable. It is just priced, and the price comes out of your home. No conscience meter, no morality score, no "you rejected N people" on the ending screen. Three endings, all landing on the same picture: the queue outside is still there. Zero image and audio assets — 120 portraits, every sheet of paper, every stamp and the printer itself are generated at runtime with canvas and WebAudio. English and 中文. Every screening rule in the manual has a real-world source; the companies and people are fictional, the numbers are not.